Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/N-Philes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-26 13:36Z 

N-Philes

 * — (View AfD)

Sppedy deletion contested. No assertion of notability is made, fails WP:RS WP:V and WP:WEB. The content has not been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself. The website or content has not won a notable independent award from either a publication or organization. The content is not distributed via a medium which is both well known and independent of the creators, either through an online newspaper or magazine, an online publisher, or an online broadcaster. Article should be deleted RWR8189 11:47, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - no assertion of notability, no reliable sources, no sources at all, reads like an advert. WP:V and WP:RS apply and this should go. Moreschi Deletion! 12:37, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. MER-C 13:09, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. (I removed the "speedy" tag, as the article has existed since october, and has been editied by a number of people; I don't think that speedying is the correct route in such case.) --Mel Etitis  ( Μελ Ετητης ) 18:20, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete It's a comprehensive and well-written article, but I see no evidence of notability. Chairman S. Talk  Contribs  02:35, 26 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.