Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/N.W.A. (New World Agenda)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:32, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

N.W.A. (New World Agenda)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested prod. Article fails notability criteria for albums. And as this album will be released in Februrary 2011 it fails also WP:CRYSTAL. Armbrust Talk  Contribs  05:45, 12 September 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 19 September 2010 (UTC) Category:Relisted AfD debates
 * It should not be deleted because it fits guidelines more than other albums here that have not been nominated for deletion. Take Detox for example. Not a single released, nor a release date in sight and it is still a huge article. 50 Cent's latest album also has had no singles and is still a huge article. We should not delete it because not only does it have two official singles, but two official remixes and two official music videos. I say we leave it. - broomtherapper —Preceding unsigned comment added by Broomtherapper (talk • contribs) 22:34, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 18:02, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete Fails WP:CRYSTAL. No tracklist, cover or release date = no article. Also Broom uses that exact argument on every album he likes that gets nominated for deletion.  Red Flag on  the Right Side  02:16, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:32, 28 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep - From WP:CRYSTAL, "All articles about anticipated events must be verifiable, and the subject matter must be of sufficiently wide interest that it would merit an article if the event had already occurred." This article appears to meet these criterion. And yes, should stop using WP:OTHERCRAP. --Kvng (talk) 15:25, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.