Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/N. K. Naik


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   '''Speedy Keep. Nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure)''' Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 21:10, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

N. K. Naik

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

N. K. Naik fails to meet all the conditions set in WP:PROF from Engineering academia, he is not there yet, his books are not widley held, no outstanding achievements or awards in the field kaeiou (talk) 01:52, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —David Eppstein (talk) 04:08, 1 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep - lots of gscholar hits (i see about 200 journal articles). h-index is 17. And a fellow of National Academy of Sciences means, he meets #3 for WP:PROF.--Sodabottle (talk) 04:34, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep on basis of GS cites noted above and Fellowship. Did the nominator think that they were unimportant or did he just not notice them? Xxanthippe (talk) 05:04, 1 March 2010 (UTC).
 * Keep. Ok citation counts in Google scholar, but membership in two national academies is what convinces me. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:03, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - for reasons furnished above. Notable - sans doubt.  Arjun  024  08:26, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - my fault, I will update his page, you may close this afd to keep - afd nominator. Thx. --kaeiou (talk) 12:28, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.