Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/N. Scott Stedman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman 18:06, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

N. Scott Stedman

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No independent sources (links are to a dead site that didn't look reliable anyway and his own website). Clearly vanity/promotional. I don't know if the L magazine is notable, but if it is that doesn't mean this guy is, as notability is not inherited. DreamGuy (talk) 14:50, 8 May 2009 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:16, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Delete. Nothing is sourced leaving the content in question. Been around for years, doesn't look like anybody's going to make it notable. CaptainMorgan (talk) 02:53, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy merge and redirect to magazine whatever can be sourced. ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:02, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete since nothing appears salvageable. Drawn Some (talk) 03:36, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.