Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NAADUC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy deleted. Mailer Diablo 04:04, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

NAADUC
Original research, if not patent nonsense. Stormie 01:07, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Delete Looks bogus, unencyclopedic.-- The  i  kiro  id  (talk) (Help Me Improve) 01:15, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Could almost have been speedied as nonsense. Kevin 01:23, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per reasons in related AfD below. TheProject 01:29, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as patent nonsense. -- MarcoTolo 01:51, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as nonsense, plus "do not remove...without express written approval"? Here? Are they kidding? ~Kylu ( u | t )  02:14, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Unverifiable conspiracy theory. See discussion with author on her talk page. Fan1967 02:21, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 1-million-mph-Speedy Delete I had no clue people can patent on Wikipedia... Wikipedia is like a park, and lets say that trees, benches, etc are articles. Can a visitor protect one of those objects in a public park from being removed? No, I don't think so. Funnybunny (talk/QRVS) 03:08, 6 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.