Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NAFTA & The 100 Mile Diet: Economic Implications


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 08:42, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

NAFTA & The 100 Mile Diet: Economic Implications
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Original essay which ties 100 Mile Diet and NAFTA. The references cited are either about the diet of about NAFTA, but not about both. Hence the article fails WP:SYNTH badly. - Altenmann >t 01:06, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete this is a rather obvious original argument, cobbling together sources about either the 100 mile diet or agriculture statistics in an attempt to prove the thesis that "Widespread local eating may decrease the volume of agricultural trade between the three countries; especially trade of products that can be grown in Canada." This looks like a (very) rough draft of a college paper or maybe even a journal article, but it's inappropriate for Wikipedia. --Sancho Mandoval (talk) 17:22, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: An essay. Joe Chill (talk) 19:01, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.