Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NANI KRISH


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  06:12, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

NANI KRISH

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:TOOSOON: Producer and director of an upcoming film The-Oppera and the film's notability is also in doubt. The page was also been deleted four times (see previous deletion log here and here). GSS (talk) 17:42, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 17:43, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 17:43, 5 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep: Makes a good case of WP:GNG. Sources: Indian Express, The Hans India, The Hindu. Anup   [Talk]  16:38, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * And that's it 3 sources what else? The only notability I can see is He is the son of musician and composer U. Srinivas also Indian newspapers are increadingly happy to act as PR agents for anyone who claims to be a star. Maybe it pass GNG with these three soruces but still not yet for a stand alone article. It can be redirect to his film but same as I said before the film's notability is also in doubt.


 * I also want to add that the article was earlier created by User:Editor6666 who is already block for removing speedy deletion tag from Nani Krish which been deleted for 3 times (A7) already and user:Writer6666 recreated it by using uppercase. GSS (talk) 18:10, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Here is another one, Metro India. Mind the quality of sources. Subject should not be held culprit for being son of a notable person. Is there substantial coverage in multiple reliable sources, yes there is. Your comment, "maybe it pass GNG with these three soruces but still TOOSOON", is self-contradicting and honestly, to be blunt, rubbish. Subject passes GNG, thus qualifies for a standalone. (I'm not interested in being a part of long chain of question-answer. Wait for other editors to weigh in their opinion. That it should be "kept" is my opinion and I'm not going to change it.) Anup   [Talk]  18:35, 11 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Please note there is a sock puppet investigation going on these accounts at SPI Bandababubanda. GSS (talk) 18:45, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:06, 12 September 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:25, 19 September 2016 (UTC) pls remove the deletion tag sir because NANI KRISH is an notable person i dont know why you people are keeping deletion tag pls keep this article dont delete it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Conquer192 (talk • contribs) 13:51, 19 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete concur with nom. Listed references do mention subject, but coverage is not in-depth. Agree with WP:TOOSOON. MB 14:31, 19 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Just not quite yet notable enough really. Eagleash (talk) 15:54, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete TOOSOON and this is salt evasion. So this needs to be salted as well per Nani Krish. --Majora (talk) 03:22, 22 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.