Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NARAL Pro-Choice Massachusetts


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 05:04, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

NARAL Pro-Choice Massachusetts

 * – ( View AfD View log )

WP:CLUB says that "Individual chapters, divisions, departments, and other sub-units of notable organizations are only rarely notable enough to warrant a separate article." No evidence that the Massachusetts chapter is independently notable. Nothing links to the page except the main NARAL page. Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 02:42, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the main NARAL article. Nyttend (talk) 14:28, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:34, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  —Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 21:33, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  —Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 21:33, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  —Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 21:33, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions.  —Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 21:33, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: Heck, I'm on the organization's rolls, but I agree the state chapter has no independent notability.  Ravenswing  22:17, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and WP:CLUB. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:51, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. - Schrandit (talk) 09:07, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.