Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NASA DEVELOP National Program


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  22:35, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

NASA DEVELOP National Program

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Pure organizational, borderline promotional. No external sources, no indication of notability per GNG, directory-style content, etc. Drmies (talk) 03:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep By virtue of being from NASA, I think it passes notability, but it definitely needs sources, and to change in style. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 06:46, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but "it's from NASA" is not an argument for notability. Drmies (talk) 01:35, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * True, but on a Google search, I found some non-trivial mentions. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 02:14, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Burden is on you to identify the specific sources you think bolster your case, so they can be considered here. — swpb T go beyond 20:44, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. Look at "news". I think those sources put it on the periphery of "notable". Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 03:23, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 11:19, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 11:19, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   21:51, 5 February 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:57, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete- doesn't seem to be a notable program.--Rusf10 (talk) 05:47, 16 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.