Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NASA eClips


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel (talk) 23:23, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

NASA eClips

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not meet WP:GNG. The longest mention in any news source is an Atlantic piece that dedicates less than 100 words to the subject, which includes WP:INTERVIEW content. The only book I found that had more than a trivial mention of the podcast was published by NASA and NASA is also listed as a contributor. The show might qualify for WP:WEBCRIT due to the emmy, but the SNG also states that "These criteria are presented as rules of thumb for easily identifying web content about which Wikipedia should probably have an article. In almost all cases, a thorough search for independent, third-party reliable sources will be successful for content meeting one or both of these criteria. However, meeting these criteria is not a guarantee that Wikipedia will host a separate, stand-alone article on the website." TipsyElephant (talk) 23:24, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. TipsyElephant (talk) 23:24, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. TipsyElephant (talk) 23:24, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. TipsyElephant (talk) 23:24, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. TipsyElephant (talk) 23:24, 7 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.