Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NASLA


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 20:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

NASLA

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Page describes a project which started in 2010, and based upon https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/262209/reporting/it is now finished. The project webpage now links somewhere else, and I could not find anything on it on the web except for other uses of the name. A relic. Ldm1954 (talk) 21:10, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Ldm1954 (talk) 21:10, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete:Fails all notability criteria. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. This article, advances an acronym which would not be acceptable unless there was multiple, reliable and independent sources that the acronym itself was notable. "Nanostructured Anti-septical Coatings", a European research project about a product that has yet to be invented. --  Otr500 (talk) 05:35, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: WP:NN Funding alone does not justify the notability of a research project. No sources to indicate research need outside corporate interest of four unnamed SMEs. As written the article is too vague to see if there is another project into which a merge could be justified, so !vote to delete. Jamietw (talk) 20:35, 9 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.