Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NASL Soccer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 13:11, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

NASL Soccer

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete nn video game. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:47, 25 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 18:31, 25 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep did the nom actually go as far as do a single Google search on the topic? With a bit of help from WP:VG/M this could go featured. User:Krator (t c) 17:51, 27 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep Relevant-ish links...   . There's also a (brief) digitpress.com review, but digitpress is blacklisted right now because someone kept spamming links to it; find it yourself if you're interested. Some current game sites mention it's existence at least (gamespy, ign, etc.), although they haven't reviewed it. Seeing how it's a 1979 release, establishing notability is probably going to be a little harder relative to a more modern release. That said - it was a professional game released by one of only a few video game companies at the time. It garnered some reviews, at least three of which made it into the links above (brief reviews, and by reviewers generally not considered most notable unfortunately). And the article was less than 2 days old when someone AfD'd it; possibly the creator or someone else can find something more relevant. That said - if nobody can find any other sources on this topic, I may change my opinion. I strongly doubt this will ever be able to be more than start class, but who knows. Coanda-1910 (talk) 20:13, 28 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak keep per Coanda-1910. Razorflame 01:15, 3 May 2008 (UTC)


 * keep assuming someone volunteers to expand and source it. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:13, 3 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.