Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NATO peacekeeping


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Stifle (talk) 14:49, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

NATO peacekeeping

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This page is redundant with List of United Nations peacekeeping missions Jminthorne (talk) 07:12, 4 September 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:09, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge Parts of this are also redundant with NATO. The article seems to focus on Yugoslavia and Afghanistan. I recommend merging any info from this article before deleting. For example, I could not find the ops listed here on the List of United Nations peacekeeping missions (KFOR, SFOR and others). Wouldn't want to leave any orphans behind as a result of delete. Ebonyskye (talk) 07:26, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Possible keep This seems like it could be a notable topic. The article as it is leaves me a little confused however. I thought we were fighting a war in Afghanistan, not peacekeeping. Borock (talk) 15:29, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military and combat-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 22:51, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete this is redundant with NATO, and does not add any useful information. Buckshot06(prof) 23:10, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Very weak keep While the article is currently in a very poor condition, it is a viable topic; NATO peacekeeping operations have received mountains of coverage in books, newspapers, etc. Nick-D (talk) 04:58, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep very notable topic. And the article, even though brief, contains useful wikilinks. Bwrs (talk) 00:44, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep definitly notable, as evidenced in the article and its reference section. If anything, the list should be merged into this article, as lists generally are of lesser notability than their parent topics.  Them  From  Space  02:18, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Probably notable topic. SYSS Mouse (talk) 03:42, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.