Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NATURAL


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe deckertalk 19:05, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

NATURAL

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Another 4GL but without a single meaningful reference despite being around since 2006. Fails WP:GNG. I can see nothing especially notable about this which maybe why there are no refs  Velella  Velella Talk  19:52, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:44, 4 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete: My searches are mainly turning up firms proposing migration from ADABAS/NATURAL rather than in-depth coverage of the 4GL itself. A comment on the article Talk page suggests that reference material is available to licensed users on the vendor's site, but that would be primary sources. NATURAL itself already has brief context coverage on the ADABAS and Software AG pages. Falls short of WP:PRODUCT and WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 19:53, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as there's nothing to even suggest minimal general notability so delete for now until a better article is available. Notifying past user . SwisterTwister   talk  07:15, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - due to the commonality of the name, researching was difficult. Did not find any information on the searches which seemed to be about this particular subject. Ping me if someone turns up in-depth reliable sources.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:07, 11 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.