Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NAVV


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:32, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

NAVV

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Does not appear to meet notability guidelines. One app in an ocean of them, and the only sources are "this exists" sources, and do not establish notability. Sven Manguard Talk  05:39, 12 November 2010 (UTC)*Note:  This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 06:32, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Reputile But as this is a consumer product where people should know everything about it, shouldn't the trusted source of wikipedia be the guide. NAVV is one of biggest apps on the Itunes store, and is number one in many countrys and so, it is a topic of intrest —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.82.155.251 (talk) 16:49, 12 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Strong delete - "references" do not provide the significant coverage required to demonstrate notability per WP:GNG, and a little spammy. ukexpat (talk) 20:31, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and ukexpat. See also Files for upload/January 2015.    —  Jeff G.  ツ ''' 19:09, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.