Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NBA Jam (TV series)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, weakly - no prejudice against a renomination by someone who has done a thorough BEFORE analysis. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 22:14, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

NBA Jam (TV series)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article has been unsourced since 2006. Notability of topic is in question. Coin945 (talk) 05:24, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Coin945 (talk) 05:24, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:03, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:03, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:03, 13 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep, the nominator does not propose a valid WP:DEL-REASON. The nominator does not say which notability guideline this article fails to meet. SailingInABathTub (talk) 10:33, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Their referral to "notability" presumably refers to Notability. Are you saying it is notable?—Bagumba (talk) 17:25, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm saying that the nominator does not say that it is not. SailingInABathTub (talk) 18:21, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * The nominator has mass-nominated just over 50 random articles today all with the same rationale, and, as almost inevitably happens in these cases, people are resisting that. Uncle G (talk) 19:07, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete an unsourced bunch of rubbish on a non-notable TV program.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:16, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. I was able to find a couple sources online, but they were fairly scant on information, and I'm not sure about notability. jp×g 08:36, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Very weak keep The sourcing is not very good, but it is enough to pass our notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:27, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * All the references come from the same source. Anybody able to track down other sources? Foxnpichu (talk) 15:54, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Not that I could find. There were a huge number of websites scraped from Wikipedia, which clogged up my search a lot. I imagine someone with an iron stomach might be able to trawl through the crap and find something, though. Perhaps someone who spoke Filipino would have a better shot. jp×g 20:56, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * In that case, I suppose I’ll throw in a Weak Keep for now, though I might change my mind. Foxnpichu (talk) 23:13, 15 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.