Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NC-17 album


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:03, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

NC-17 album

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unreferenced, No reference to reliable independent sources, fails all criteria at WP:NALBUM, contested prod WWGB (talk) 23:35, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 01:16, 5 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete, pending evidence of non-trivial coverage from reliable publications. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:55, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Draft move to draftspace until more coverage is available. Should be notable when it is released and gets reviewed in reliable sources Atlantic306 (talk) 22:27, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Draft. I agree with User:Atlantic306 who believes the article will be more notable when it is released and gets reviewed in reliable sources (The artist is of sufficient notability where the reliable sources will come). A considerable amount of work when into the article. It makes little sense to upset the people who made the article in good faith. Wikipedia needs to be an editor friendly wiki. Not a wiki that quickly vaporizes the work of its editors when it is not warranted to do so. Wikipedia is only as strong as its editor base.  Attention needs to be paid to editor retention. Knox490 (talk) 00:22, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Draftify per above. Very reasonable to assume that this album will get wide coverage once it actually is released. Too soon right now.  A  Train talk 23:34, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Draft per above. Pure speculation but this album will likely become notable upon release. Move to Draft:NC-17 (album) at best, the disambiguator should be embedded in brackets. Hayman30 (talk) 15:05, 9 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.