Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NCCNHR


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:54, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

NCCNHR

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I can't find significant coverage for this company. Joe Chill (talk) 00:24, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 05:00, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Rename the article to lose the acronym. Be sure to search for the earlier name of the group if obsessing over lack of mentions. This one hit seems sufficient to assure notability: http://www.healthfinder.gov/orgs/hr1872.htm  Carrite (talk) 07:28, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'm at a loss to understand how the nominator was unable to find significant coverage, as clicking on the Google Books search linked above finds hundreds of reliable sources such as, and . Phil Bridger (talk) 12:23, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep and immediately reduce to a neutral stub. Right now it's a promo piece. East of Borschov (talk)
 * Keep I side with Phil on this one. Many usable sources on this. I even suggest closing this as keep per WP:SNOW. Undead Warrior (talk) 03:13, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.