Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NCMO


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  &gt; R a d i a n t &lt;  10:49, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

NCMO

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This has been marked for 8 months as non-notable and little effort has been made to make it so. Also, it is little more than a dictionary defintion with a bit of history attached. Psu256 15:11, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

I think it should stay. I'm the last person who edited this and tried to show that it's of much wider interest than the flash-in-the-pan websites that were originally the focus of the article. Definitions of terms like this -- well-known in subcultures but little-known outside -- are one of the major attractions of Wikipedia for me. Deleting this makes it poorer only; leaving it documents a term and phenomenon that is still current and has been used for decades, and harms Wikipedia in no way. As for the assertion that the article is too little: That's how an article grows. It's got to start somewhere. 216.128.233.19 03:27, 20 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I mean you no offense, but if your interest lies in definitions of terms like this, you are in the wrong place. Please refer to WP:NEO. Psu256 12:04, 21 May 2007 (UTC)


 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, W.marsh 02:29, 22 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete as dicdef, possible neologism too. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 04:49, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neologism and since "the term is still fairly uncommon outside of the Provo, Utah or Rexburg, Idaho", unlikely to be of sufficient notability. BTLizard 09:06, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, local neologism. Not sure much more needs to be said about it.  Ark yan  &#149; (talk) 15:41, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.