Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NCUK


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 23:34, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

NCUK

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Worthy, but I couldn't establish that it is WP:NOTABLE. Has been tagged for notability for 7 years; hopefully we can resolve it now. Boleyn (talk) 19:34, 15 April 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 19:34, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep: found a couple of sources which seem to confirm notability. Pam  D  22:58, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
 * What are the ones you've found? I'm having difficulty finding non-trivial, independent sources. Googling, I've come across many references to NCUK on various universities' websites, but they're all member organisations so perhaps not independent. Apart from these, other Google results typically have just one or two sentences, and I can't find any in-depth pieces.--A bit iffy (talk) 16:27, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * See article -I expanded it from sources. Pam  D  06:29, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:46, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:46, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:46, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 23:19, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Thanks to Pam  D 's feat of resource finding. LaMona (talk) 19:48, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Not breathtaking coverage, but then these workhorse programmes seldom get that.-- Elmidae (talk) 19:08, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.