Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NELSAP 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. - Gl e n 15:21, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

NELSAP
recreation of previously deleted article, prod removed with no explanation. Does not provide any independent evidence for notability. --Peta 01:07, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

*Speedy delete per CSD G4. Already tagged. --Dennisthe2 17:44, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * How about this: citation in New York Times of Jan. 16, 2004, article about a recreated ski area. And this  menion in 2005 article of The Independent. And this  article in 2005 from the Boston Globe newspaper, on Boston.com - (Oh, keep by the way). DavidWBrooks 01:09, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per DavidWBrooks; has been featured on the Boston Globe, New York Times, and The Independent.--TBC TaLk?!? 01:29, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep but in future a descriptive edit summary should be used for de-prodding. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 08:00, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * On second thought, they cite. Rescinded vote, cast as Abstain.  --Dennisthe2 17:47, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

KEEP!


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.