Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NERF wars (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 21:42, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

NERF wars
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Notability not established. All sources are fansites, which do not pass our WP:RS policy. —  Dæ dαlus Contribs 02:01, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

I would also like to add that this article was kept two years ago, but nothing has happened which would warrant an article in those two years.—  Dæ dαlus Contribs 02:03, 29 May 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * question- There appear to be several reliable sources listed in the previous AFD. Is there anything wrong with them that they're not enough to support keeping the article? Umbralcorax (talk) 13:47, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:42, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep I knew this looked familiar... The sources I found in the last AfD still demonstrate notability. They just need to be added to the article. Jclemens (talk) 21:04, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep- Since I never actually got an answer to my previous question, I'm going to assume the answer is no. The sources mentioned in the previous AFD's is enough to prove notability. Umbralcorax (talk) 03:07, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep covered with a good sources and if we can got articles - World War 3 and World War 4, this is OK...--Aleksa Lukic (talk) 10:06, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per WP:SK: "making nominations of the same article with the same arguments after they were strongly rejected". Notability was established in the previous AFD which the nominator should have consulted per our deletion policy. Colonel Warden (talk) 08:12, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per User:Jclemens from last AfD. There are good sources that just need to be added..  Traxs    7   17:30, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.