Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NERV (reactor)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:19, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

NERV (reactor)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I can't find significant coverage of this. Google Books or Scholar for "natural endogenous respiration vessel" come up empty. Google is mostly Wikipedia mirrors, and a thesis by a student of the inventor. Perhaps this topic doesn't meet our notability criteria? Ajpolino (talk) 19:15, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Pinging who de-prodded this article. Ajpolino (talk) 19:16, 7 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete. A quick Google scholar search turned up only a single result that didn't even show the term  natural endogenous respiration vessel. Clearly fails the GNG. Ships  &amp;  Space (Edits) 20:23, 7 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering and Environment.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  00:27, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Looks like a patent. No refs. Desertarun (talk) 14:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.