Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NFL coaching trees


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Coaching tree. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 09:33, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

NFL coaching trees

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Classic case example of Original research. Ibluffsocall (talk) 22:42, 20 January 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:03, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete; see above. Drmies (talk) 23:30, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:14, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep for the same reasons as I noted for Coaching tree, or merge the two articles as one. Bearian (talk) 18:09, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to the Coaching tree article (where I gave reasons to keep that article). There is no reason for a separate article on NFL coaching trees, at least that I can see.--Paul McDonald (talk) 05:26, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment as noted at Articles for deletion/Coaching tree, this is definitely not original research.--Paul McDonald (talk) 05:36, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete same content as Coaching tree. Jaque Hammer (talk) 05:23, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge into Coaching Tree as per above. So far this seems to be an NFL-specific neologism. Unless and until this trend starts appearing in college football there is no reason for a specific article on the NFL. And in any case, it's generally better to focus on building up one article, as opposed to dividing and duplicating your efforts on a number of sub-pages. -- RoninBK T C 09:08, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect As above. Separate article not needed. Nwlaw63 (talk) 20:58, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.