Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NFTBooks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 08:43, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

NFTBooks

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Contested PROD. Fails NWEB/NCORP - no independent coverage, sourced to press releases and business/crypto listings. KH-1 (talk) 11:15, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Australia. Shellwood (talk) 11:25, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Citations are not acceptable, some are press releases, some are from Crypto sites which are deemed unreliable. Medium is a blogging site, which is also not acceptable. Chelokabob (talk) 22:47, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete or Draftafy Fails GNG. At first glance, the source that appears to have reported, that isn't from unreliable crypto sites, is the yahoo finance article. But looking closer this is just a copy of the GlobeNewswire press release and so can't be called independent (and even if it could one source isn't enough for notability). Additionally I could find no sources through a search on google (apart from the crypto press) and therefore I can't currently see how this can be notable.


 * I notice that the article had an in creation tag, which I removed as the page hadn't been edited in 2 days. If editors of this article still think it can be developed than I'm not opposed to moving it to a draft. Cakelot1 (talk) 11:35, 6 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:GNG, coverage seems mainly press releases or similar. LibStar (talk) 22:58, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete fails notability criteria, references are mainly relying on primary sourcing.  HighKing++ 12:56, 9 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.