Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NFT Now


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Star  Mississippi  01:39, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

NFT Now

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Most of this looks like bought publicity. There's a small bit of collateral coverage in serious newspapers, but overall it does not appear to amount to WP:SIGCOV. The company is still quite young, and so the lack of coverage is in line with this. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 23:52, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency and Companies. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 23:52, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with nom, looks like passing mentions, some unreliable as sources. Oaktree b (talk) 03:09, 10 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Disagree with nom but appreciate the feedback. None of the publicity is bought and Christie's co-sign is very significant in the art world. Removed the TIME quote and Miami Magazine section to make it more neutral. Open to adding more sources and other suggestions for improving the entry. ContentCandy (talk) 14:59, 10 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete, it does not meet WP:NCORP. There are mentions in reliable sources, but fail at independent and significant coverage. MarioGom (talk) 20:56, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:NCORP criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing++ 16:49, 16 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.