Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NGA Human Resources


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 04:20, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

NGA Human Resources

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article is little more than blatant advertising, and has survived CSD on the grounds of the creator improving it. Company could well be notable but as it stands would have to be totally rewritten to be encyclopaedic. Triptothecottage (talk) 07:48, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:39, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:39, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:27, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:27, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as corporate spam, likely COI driven. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:15, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:36, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Any article that says it is a global provider of solutions, when it appears to have nothing to do with solutions, is clearly marketing. Also note strong overlap with Northgate Information Solutions. W Nowicki (talk) 17:01, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, a loaded PR page. The way it is written is like a press release or an advert. Kierzek (talk) 22:52, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Blatant WP:PROMO. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   18:57, 7 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.