Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NGC 1316C


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of NGC objects. Salvio 13:01, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

NGC 1316C

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable galaxy. simbad reference is for NGC 1316, not 1316c anyway. Sam-2727 (talk) 16:24, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Sam-2727 (talk) 16:24, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I made a mistake in the source link. Check it http://simbad.u-strasbg.fr/simbad/sim-id?Ident=NGC+1316C&submit=submit+id https://theskylive.com/sky/deepsky/ngc1316c-object 𝘋𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘺𝘦𝘴 ϟ Heyyo? 16:27, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
 * , I don't think these still demonstrate notability, because these websites cover every object in the sky. Simbad in particular doesn't necessarily demonstrate notability. Sam-2727 (talk) 16:35, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Note to closer Consensus seems to be redirecting NGC objects to list of NGC objects, so if consensus is to delete, the article should be redirected to List of NGC objects (1001–2000). Sam-2727 (talk) 02:35, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Currently NGC1316C is not part of the list of NGC objects. However another option would be to move the text to the Fornax Cluster section of Fornax and redirect there. welterde, 2001:678:C70:0:6:3:0:9 (talk) 09:53, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio 18:24, 3 August 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   09:46, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of NGC objects: Unless there is significant content for a stand alone article I think the list is the best home for this content.   // Timothy ::  talk  18:11, 19 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.