Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NGC 3944


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of NGC objects (3001–4000).  Arbitrarily0  ( talk ) 04:29, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

NGC 3944

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NASTRO. A surprising number of published papers mention this object, but only as a part of large surveys and lists. I couldn't find any mention of it in a dedicated study or as part of a small number of objects. Lithopsian (talk) 14:12, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Lithopsian (talk) 14:12, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Apparently it was discovered in 1785, so it fulfills criterion 4, but the coverage doesn't go beyond table listings, ie. . --C messier (talk) 13:57, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:53, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of NGC objects (3001–4000); I already added an entry. This uninteresting galaxy only appears to have been studied in surveys; there are no dedicated studies that I could find. It fails to satisfy WP:GNG. Praemonitus (talk) 14:23, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect as described above. The references to this galaxy in NED seem to be mostly in catalog papers and surveys, with little or no literature specific to this galaxy. Just being in the NGC catalog isn't enough for notability. Aldebarium (talk) 20:26, 14 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.