Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NG Media Server


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Missvain (talk) 07:32, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

NG Media Server

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I could not find reliable, independent articles that establish notability. Article reads as promotional. Deunanknute (talk) 23:00, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 23:30, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 23:34, 6 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as a promotional article with no coverage outside of the subject it is covering. --Mr. Guye (talk) 23:36, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 23:46, 6 February 2015 (UTC)


 * delete Unencyclopedic topic, lack of secondary sources giving coverage to it. "Streaming server" would be notable, as it's a technical topic of some interest. "Apache" would be notable, as it's a major web server with vast secondary attention paid to it. This is neither. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:01, 7 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references, created by an SPA as possibly promotional. A search turned up no significant RS coverage of this software.Dialectric (talk) 16:14, 8 February 2015 (UTC)


 * keep Not really promotional, its like this page [] it's a streaming engine solution/sofware / I will try to find more references of this software and update this page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lockall Smyr (talk • contribs) 17:32, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.