Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NIGHT OF THE DAY OF THE DAWN OF THE SON OF THE BRIDE OF THE RETURN OF THE REVENGE OF THE TERROR OF THE ATTACK OF THE MUTANT, HELLBOUND, FLESH-EATING, CRAWLING, ALIEN, ZOMBIFIED, SUBHUMANOID LIVING DEAD – PART 5


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete by Shirik Clear hoax. The sources were completely misrepresented. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 03:09, 28 December 2010 (UTC) ===NIGHT OF THE DAY OF THE DAWN OF THE SON OF THE BRIDE OF THE RETURN OF THE REVENGE OF THE TERROR OF THE ATTACK OF THE MUTANT, HELLBOUND, FLESH-EATING, CRAWLING, ALIEN, ZOMBIFIED, SUBHUMANOID LIVING DEAD – PART 5===


 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable film, not even listed at imdb Corvus cornix  talk  00:56, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. This film fails WP:V. Supplied references don't check out. An independent search for sources yields nothing. "Night of the Day... Part 3" exists, but Part 5 probably doesn't. • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 28 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Silly joke title... but at least Part three is on IMDB. At best, an article on Part 5 seems WP:TOOSOON.  The fluffy article is apparently written as a promotion of a film-charity project involving the film, and offers only two sources... one a dead link to Daily Record  and the other a link to Philly Blurbs  which leads to an unrelated article about Charlie Sheen.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 01:47, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong keep—awesome title. Mono (talk) 01:51, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Because 1. MQS says "delete" 2. the title is annoying the hell out of me 3. couldn't find significant coverage of this film in reliable sources. / ƒETCH COMMS  /  01:52, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No good or even passable sources.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  02:08, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, that's why the dogs have been barking since twilight ... better lock the doors now. Delete per WP:V. Antandrus  (talk) 02:12, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * G3 because the article clearly misappropriates the two sources — one's a dead link and the other isn't what it says it is. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 02:38, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.