Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NIMG


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 17:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

NIMG

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Maybe a neologism but no relevant sourcing and little support in a Google search. Also suffers from POV issues. Justallofthem (talk) 17:26, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete Wow, I can't believe this nonsense has been around since 2006. L0b0t (talk) 17:37, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Well between us we have cleaned it up some and I think the lead makes sense now but I would still remove the unsourced, unrelated, and highly POV 2nd paragraph. Of course, the question remains as to whether this possible neologism is notable enough for inclusion given its limited appearance. --Justallofthem (talk) 17:54, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I've been able able to find plenty of sources that use the phrase but no sources that mention the usage of the phrase or acronym. Seems to fail WP:V.  L0b0t (talk) 18:17, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Don't think we are finding any baby in that bathwater. --Justallofthem (talk) 18:23, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * DTAN Acronym neologism. ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:07, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No assertion of notability. ←  Spidern  →  18:35, 29 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Strong delete clearly non-notable neologism ukexpat (talk) 19:03, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as totally non-notable. Drmies (talk) 21:26, 29 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.