Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NJPW Dojo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to New Japan Pro Wrestling. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 02:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

NJPW Dojo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG with no significant independent coverage. I have no problem with redirecting this to New Japan Pro Wrestling, but it doesn't deserve its own article.Mdtemp (talk) 22:32, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 23:28, 6 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete: per nomination.  Crash Under  ride  01:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge - anything that can be salvaged into New Japan Pro Wrestling. No prejudice against recreation if reliable third party sourced can be found to create a separate article. Nikki  ♥  311   09:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect - a short (sourced) mention could easily be put into the main article, but 99 percent of this article fail WP:NOTDIRECTORY. No stand-alone notability established. GermanJoe (talk) 10:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note - I reverted an early deletion of the article to allow a formal closure of this discussion beforehand. GermanJoe (talk) 10:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, mention at New Japan Pro Wrestling and then redirect if needed as there's nothing to suggest a currently better article overall. SwisterTwister   talk  20:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete anything salvageable can go to New Japan Pro Wrestling.LM2000 (talk) 03:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:47, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:47, 13 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.