Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NJR Zoids


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 06:28, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

NJR Zoids

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is simply a trivial list of toys without any assertion of importance or notability. TTN (talk) 17:38, 25 August 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:36, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: A list of non-notable toys. Joe Chill (talk) 21:04, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Please note WP:JNN and User:Stifle/Don't say non-notable. Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 19:39, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Please note WP:DONTPOINTMETOESSAYS. Joe Chill (talk) 20:17, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:58, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn trivia that has no independent significance. Eusebeus (talk) 21:24, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * WP:JNN is not really a real reason for deletion, though. Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 22:01, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect (not sure how likely a search term it is). Like the other zoid sub articles, these are pretty much approximating a directory of products made by this company.  Very little secondary sourcing and very little non-independent sourcing even. Protonk (talk) 03:55, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.