Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NJ Thoroughbred Horsemen v. NCAA


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) SMP0328. (talk) 19:15, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

NJ Thoroughbred Horsemen v. NCAA

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is simply the companion case to Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association. This article should be deleted or demoted to being a redirect to Murphy. SMP0328. (talk) 19:34, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:42, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Keep I will happily redirect, as long as no one deletes. Rhadow (talk) 02:21, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm fine with converting this article to being a redirect. It's basically the same as a delete. SMP0328. (talk) 02:42, 17 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Then retract this AfD, . A close read will show that I suggested a redirect a year ago. Rhadow (talk) 06:42, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If the article is changed to a redirect, I will retract. SMP0328. (talk) 06:45, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The article can't be redirect until the AfD is closed.--Rusf10 (talk) 18:38, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:13, 17 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Redirect- as per above.--Rusf10 (talk) 18:38, 17 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.