Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NLP practitioner

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 10:07, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

NLP practitioner
POV essay on the alleged worthlessness of the NLP exam. Radiant! 15:40, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete. Despite the fact that the POV stuff was added to the original article (see the History), the article even in its original form is entirely subsumed by existing material in the Neuro-linguistic programming article. As a matter of fact, even the alleged commercialism of NLP is covered in that very fine article. HyperZonktalk 18:23, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, POV gripe. Megan1967 23:43, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - original research (and that's being kind) - David Gerard 23:37, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)