Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NMKNMP


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Snow Tone 20:10, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

NMKNMP

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:NEO \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 08:27, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Neutral - I would say strong delete... 1000 ghits is doesn't exactly feel like a notable term - plus I think the advice is terrible.  Reprehensible.  Your stepkids are just as much your problem as your biological kids.  But I think my anger towards any therapist who would give this advice would make it unfair for me to vote here.     7   talk &#124; &Delta; &#124;   08:34, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non notable Ha rle m 675  08:48, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Definitely not notable. I find about 10 unique hits... the other 1,100 are because someone in a newsgroup has the acronym in his/her signature tag. Location (talk) 08:52, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete No claim of notability present in the "article." Nosleep  break my slumber 09:49, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Sadly, there are no speedy criteria that cover neologisms, whether they claim notability or not. A7 does not apply to neologisms. Anyway, delete, not notable and the therapist claim is unsourced, probably guesswork, and hopefully false. Hairhorn (talk) 16:34, 10 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. Unsourced, not a relevant or commonly used acronym. McMarcoP (talk) 12:22, 10 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete unreferenced WP:NEOLOGISM RadioFan (talk) 13:55, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 15:29, 10 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Unreferenced neologism  Chzz  ►  15:32, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Not a notable neologism.  Triplestop  x3  02:09, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.