Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NODWISH


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:07, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

NODWISH
Neologism. Luigi30 (&Tau;&alpha;&lambda;&kappa;) 18:26, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete 123 hits in google - not even a popular one at that. --Bachrach44 18:29, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neologism.  No evidence presented of widespread usage. Gamaliel 18:30, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * It's still just taking hold in the blogosphere where some popular bloggers have begun to use it seasonally in lieu of other greetings. A neologism, yes, but new words and ideas have to begin somewhere and I would think a progressive media such as Wikipedia would have a small bit of room for something which may, over the course of time, become something known.  I know it's not as important as the history of obscure rabbis, but everything has its place.  If you based everything here on google searches, you'd have quite a few deletions of subjects which are important to one or two people in the world... — Preceding unsigned comment added by MercuryX23 (talk • contribs)
 * Delete. Wikipedia policy expressly forbids promotion of not yet widespread terms. Wikipedia is NOT the place to promote a new word. Sorry. - Mgm|(talk) 11:44, 8 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete, fails WP:NOT. Stifle 00:57, 9 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.