Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NOS (drink)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Kevin (talk) 21:44, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

NOS (drink)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

One of several non-notable energy drinks. Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  02:49, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete As Orangemike suggests, just one of many similar drinks, and not notable in any way. For those who think a Google search is a good measure of notability I have done one. Apart from the manufacturer's site and other sites advertising and/or selling the drink, I found a large number of mentions on MySpace, Facebook, etc, together with other sites where anyone can create pages, a couple of pages making jokes out of NOS, etc etc. No significant independent coverage at all. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:30, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep for now. Apart from it being a sponsor for Toyota cars, apparently, there is some coverage and maybe it's worth giving a better look before deleting. A Gnews search (explictly excluding Toyota) finds stuff, among those a couple of links where it seems discussed controversially in New Zealand:  ; other links: , , and an award won by the drink here: . There are also some links which seem interesting but require payment. -- Cycl o pia  -  talk  14:02, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Evidently notable. Colonel Warden (talk) 22:21, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 17:05, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep A product sold all over the world seems notable enough for me. Mandsford (talk) 16:37, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep major product from major company.   DGG ( talk ) 19:55, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.