Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NOVEL PHARMACEUTICAL APPLICATIONS OF HYDROTROPY


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 23:14, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

NOVEL PHARMACEUTICAL APPLICATIONS OF HYDROTROPY

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Appears to be a scientific paper rather than an encyclopedia article. Original research. DJ Clayworth (talk) 19:26, 31 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Obvious WP:OR and what is "novel" anyway? It appears to me someone wants to promote their work with this article. -- Kimon talk 20:29, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Pretty clear case of WP:OR, unencyclopedic. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 22:20, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:OR, pretty clear this one, reads just as a scientific research paper.  Athe Weatherman   07:57, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete gently. We do not have an article about hydrotropy, unless it's better known under a different name; the concept seems to be relatively important; see Carl Neuberg for slightly more information.  But this text is not an encyclopedia article and can't be made into one easily by a non-specialist in its current state. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:05, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Uncertain The 'NOVEL' and other caps put me off, but a lot of the article looks good. Unfortunately, it's written (as others have pointed out) in the form of a research paper or university paper rather than a Wikipedia article. It does appear to me to give information that Solubility doesn't - information that's not necessarily OR. There is an impressive reference list that is not confined to or primarily from one particular source. I'd like to see a rewrite by the author (with help - from someone with more time than I've got!). Peridon (talk) 18:02, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete The author of the article has admitted that this article is a new synthesis by his professor of information existing in published journals. As a new synthesis, this constitutes original research.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:46, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * This article is very priceless ,because nowadays their are number of clinical problems are studied due to the less bioavaliabity of drugs due to the solubilization problems. So this i think that the hydrotrophy phenomenon can solve this problem at a greater extent. this article can provide us information about the new strategies of solubilization,so this article should not be removed because it will work as the knowledge expansion for the researchers. User:Monarch jagdhari Comment moved from talk page by User:DJ Clayworth. This is User:Monarch jagdhari's first edit on Wikipedia.
 * Nobody is going to argue with you that it is an important area but, Wikipedia has a policy of not publishing original research. Please read the relevant policy. -- Kimon talk 15:26, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * This is a very ecofriendly and cost-effective method of enhanceing the solubility of poorly water soluble drugs. As the conc of hydrotrope doesnot interfere with the in vitro analysis of drugs and also the conc used is safe for biological tissues and membranes. So this concept can be effectively utilised for the development of new drug delivery systems,esp with the drugs of class II, classIII and classIV. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Archana agrawal (talk • contribs) 14:17, 3 September 2009 (UTC)  This is User:Archana agrawal's first edit on Wikipedia.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:23, 3 September 2009 (UTC)


 * I object the deletion of this article and like to give JUSTIFICATION for every thing here
 * 1) the article is not a research article in original becoz the research article is specifically pointed towards one or some molecules with special application of any technology, for example if one says "use of nanotechnology for xyz gene transfer" it may be the research article, but some thing written for NANOTECHNOLOGY is not a research article.

SIMILARLY the hydrtropy is a generalized concept like solubility, infact its a kind of solubility but having different approach of solubility, every article is new untill its unknown to people and may be the writing pattern of this article make it research article in first sight. This is just a general topic written to make aware students about availability of one of the technique to solve their problem. And i use wikipedia and thankful from the depth of my heart for providing me such platform. I KNOW THAT WIKIPEDIA REMOVES THE CONTENT IF IT HAVES NO PROPER REFERENCES, so i think that if any one who wants to know detail of technology must go through the references and he may find what he/she search for.
 * 1) one of my friend comment as word NOVEL, i like to say that, in applications section i just mention the application in one line because, i m very well known of wikipedia policy and rules , not to direct put any research article, as all applications are novel from perception of its own kind of work by different users at different part of the world., In order to not to violate the rules of wikipedia i just make external links of full article available "free to access" on internet to give the students a idea about the research work going on by using this technology.
 * 2) The word PHARMACEUTICAL APPLICATIONS is used mainly because i have found the data mainly from pharmaceutical background and major work is done in pharmaceuticals, and the drugs are the moieties faces the solubility problem Majorly.
 * 3) It is stated by my friends that it is non-encyclopedic, because I m writing this article first time and i write it in cut-to-cut point wise directly to fulfill the needs of curious students, i think not to write article in elaborate bookish way and some thing which is completly point wise and sicentific may seems as research paper to many users.
 * 4) I m requesting all users to please edit this article in the way an wikipedia article to be exist, i m not very much expertise in this, now itself u may notice that my justifications are also looks like pointwise because i just know this only.
 * 5) The main objective of writing this article is to provide the students who has to use harsh and hazardous chemicals just to solubilize the compound for anlaytical or formulation of their material, to replace all such harsh chemicals with ecofriendly method.
 * 6) This topic seems to be new for me too a year back and i have search a lot on web, but there is no direct source to provide huge material for this topic, so after one year i have find this material by tough efforts, and i think no student or resercher require to wait for one year to find such concept by reading 50's of research article and applying brain to understood the confusing twisting language of reserch papers to get those tough concepts.
 * The article seems to be research article because of scientific REFERENCES quoted at last of the article,

HERE i also like to say this technology is not in-sole research of my proffessor, and he dont seek to promote his own work by this article because he already publish 150+ national and international research paper, i just seek his help because i m not a expert for writing such article, At the same time any wrong information about technology confuse the users and students

 The ONLY MOTTO of writing this article to nourish a new technology to develop it to grasshood level that it become as common as solubility and like SOLUBILITY article on wiki no body request to delete such important article''' And thats why i think i justified each question requested for deletion of this article. The ANGLE OF PERCEPTION changes every thing, and now itself i m requesting all  friends (The Wiki Users) to edit this article in format as u wish to be look compatible but this material is no doubt eligible to be exist on wiki -- Thank you  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chandan.chandna (talk • contribs) 16:28, 3 September 2009 (UTC)  — Chandan.chandna (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

do not delete the article provides solubility enhancement by hydrotropes in a nutshell.compendious summary of hydrotropes and drugs is gainful.Selection of the the title may be unfitting to the content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joshianshu (talk • contribs) — Joshianshu (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * 1) Regretful Delete WP:OR is pretty clear. Perhaps the contributor should look at this? Irbisgreif (talk) 07:07, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

This article must not be deleted because it provide a revolutionary concept to enhance the solubility (a major problem with pharmaceutical moeities) of substance(s). Increase in solubility is directly related to absorption (bioavailability)which inturn decrease the dosage regimen and improve patient compliance. It provides a platform to researcher to explore the exact mechanism of solubility enhancement through hydrotropy. According to me very few people are aware of this novel technique, so let the wikipedia make change happen and contribute to the pharmaceutical sector facing major problem of solubility. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sumitkumarjain.mcops (talk • contribs) 07:41, 6 September 2009 (UTC) — Sumitkumarjain.mcops (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * All of the SPA accounts that have come to make their voice heard here have missed the point. The information may be very important, but it is still WP:OR and Wikipedia is not the forum to publish it.  If the information is that important, it should be published in a reputable scientific journal and given the peer review it deserves.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:49, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.