Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NOW Entertainment


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  11:58, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

NOW Entertainment
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The page's articles almost all fail notability guidelines, they almost all are trivial coverage, they almost all are not reliable, and some seem written as a promostion by someone close to the company, almost like press releases. The creator of the page's account seems to just have been created for the purpose of making this wikipedia page. The page seems to be written promotionally, furthering the COI case. Bluesfan86 (talk) 21:35, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2022 February 20.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 22:01, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Companies, Internet,  and Websites.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:30, 20 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete. Rollingstone looks like a good magazine but not enough. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 23:24, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:52, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
 * comment Likely a case of "Bad Faith" edit. User:Bluesfan86  got registered on 2022-02-17 and started making disruptive edits on pages. Most of their edits have been reverted. Seem their target was to delete NOW Entertainment, an old page that has been reviewed by an older editor for months now. They only targeted that page for AFD.  WP:RBI should apply here.Ilsecondoordine (talk) 21:29, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Sources are passing mentions, not about the company. Zeddedm (talk) 11:07, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete This is a company so WP:NCORP criteria for establishing notability applies. None of the references meet the criteria especially WP:ORGIND as none include in-depth information about the *company* which is not directly attributable to the company itself or persons associated with the company. Topic fail NCORP.  HighKing++ 13:28, 2 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.