Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NPACE


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Consensus to keep following three relistings. The Bushranger One ping only 19:24, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

NPACE

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable nonprofit organization for nursing continuing education. Only sources I can find are passing mentions of the organization as an approved provider of continuing education (one of hundreds in the US) or lists of links to similar organizations. EricEnfermero Howdy! 12:09, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:03, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:06, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:06, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:22, 16 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as non-notable and promotional. (Yes, WP:NOTPROMOTION applies to nonprofits too.) --MelanieN (talk) 18:19, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per WP:NONPROFIT and WP:WHACAMOLE. -- →gab  24 dot  grab← 17:32, 27 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment – Customized Find sources links below per the search criteria: "Nurse Practitioner Associates for Continuing Education" ; it's yielding more results than the search results for the organization's acronym, and there's more source-searching options:
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 13:17, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 13:17, 16 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Highbeam search has 16 results. Nothing stands out as relevant yet though.   D r e a m Focus  15:25, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 12:33, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 00:50, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

 
 * keep - Relatively long-lived organization (nursing CE groups didn't get started until the 1970s AFAIK, so this would be among the first), and it publishes a peer-reviewed journal. --Lquilter (talk) 22:53, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:06, 4 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep&mdash; this google scholar search (npace+education) shows that the organization easily meets WP:NONPROFIT. See especially this article.  And this article, from the NIH, shows that the journal that NPACE publishes is notable, in fact it itself is the object of academic study.&mdash; alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 00:24, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.