Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NQcontent Enterprise


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete as copyvio. Deathphoenix ʕ 19:53, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

NQcontent Enterprise
Adcruft about a non-notable product RedRollerskate 19:01, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Smells of copyvio. - Kookykman| (t) e

Comment It is a copyvio, see http://www.nqcontent.com/nqcontent.cfm?a_id=346 Garion96 (talk) 20:31, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Since it's a copyvio, how do we get it speedied? RedRollerskate 20:49, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * There's a copyright permission on the talk page. Fan1967 21:53, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * D'oh! RedRollerskate 01:18, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Comment Relisting this so it can get more votes. RedRollerskate 13:12, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete can't be speedily deleted as a copy vio, but should be deleted as one. Yanksox (talk) 13:21, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Few Google hits for this term. Redirect to NQcontent.  Not a big fan of copy/paste jobs - they are rarely if ever encyclopedic.  Wickethewok 13:28, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete advertisement Avalon 21:22, 16 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.