Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NRA Platoon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mkativerata (talk) 06:57, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

NRA Platoon

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I see no reason why the NRA's platoon or any difference than anyone else's. D O N D E groovily   Talk to me  05:50, 11 October 2010 (UTC)


 * This one is so absurd that I went ahead and put up a CSD A7 on it. No reason to waste everyone here's time unless by some technical miracle/colossal error/flurry of editing, the article survives the CSD. Cheers, Sven Manguard  Talk  06:00, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't believe it meets speedy deletion criteria - being part of the National Revolutionary Army does give it some historical significance and does provide a claim of notability. While I do believe this should be deleted, I think speedy is overkill, and I'm deleting the tag. D O N D E groovily   Talk to me  06:27, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Your call. The article itself is a simple definition of a Platoon, rather than anything on any specific platoon in the Guomingdang Army. Everything in it is covered in Platoon. I don't see how a CSD is at all overkill, but its 3:00 AM where I'm at and I have no desire to push the issue or get involved any further in the AfD. Sven Manguard  Talk  06:59, 11 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Pending the survival of this article at CSD, I move for a delete by AfD on account of failing WP:N. Google had no sources that were applicable. Sven Manguard  Talk  06:02, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete There is no coverage in reliable sources. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  13:50, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:03, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:MILHIST's unit notability guideline specifically says that units below battalion have to be very very notable indeed to remain in the encyclopedia. A dicdef of a Chinese-style platoon does not meet that standard. Any material that needs to be kept should be amalgamated with Platoon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Buckshot06 (talk • contribs) 16:25, 12 October 2010
 * Delete per nom: unreferenced, not enough independant notability to distinguish it from platoon, and not even any real content. I thank the nominator for having the foresight not to do a mass nomination (which tend to fail whether the nom has merit or not).  bahamut0013  words deeds 21:22, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Anotherclown (talk) 14:38, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.