Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NRA Regiment


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mkativerata (talk) 06:56, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

NRA Regiment

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

NRA regiments are probably no different than any other military regiment D O N D E groovily   Talk to me  05:54, 11 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete My knowledge of the Guomindang military isn't quite at the level where I can say this for certain, (my academic interest focuses much more heavily on pre-gunpowder Chinese warfare) but as far as I can recall, there are no significant technical differences between the Guomindang army structure and that of the army structures western powers that backed the Guomindang at the time. Those western army structures are the basis for modern army structures. Considering the existence of the pages Platoon, Company (military unit), Regiment, ect., I can see reason to keep this page. There is not enough content as it is to currently justify this page, and sourcing, while available, will likely not be wholly on topic or add value to the coverage of the article. I doubt a redirect will be helpful, and there is not enough for a merge. Sven Manguard  Talk  07:17, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Notes: The page NRA Squad already redirects to Squad. The page NRA Division is significantly differnt from the others in the series in its level of detail, however the sourcing is slim and the content is hypertechincal. Sven Manguard  Talk  07:26, 11 October 2010 (UTC)


 * weak delete the whole bunch. Unlike some better defined styles of standard formations (like Luftwaffe Field Division), these cannot be defined any better than now, so they are doomed to remain either a dicdef or (worse?) swell into something amorphous. The topic spans two decades, during which military tactics invariably changed. And China is quite a big country, so no single regimental structure could fit all fronts and theatres. Not to mention the chaos of civil war. East of Borschov 09:24, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:06, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete unreferenced, not enough independant notability to distinguish it from regiment, and not even any real content.  bahamut0013  words deeds 21:25, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per Bahamut13. Buckshot06 (talk) 23:59, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Anotherclown (talk) 14:31, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.