Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NS1 (company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 06:26, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

NS1 (company)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

promotional article for small company. No sources except for routine products announcements and funding.  DGG ( talk ) 05:33, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as I'm not finding anything noticeably better and the article has no solidly convincing signs. SwisterTwister   talk  06:13, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:13, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:13, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:13, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:13, 14 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Quote from article "raised its first round of outside funding in 2015". WP:TOOSOON in my opinion. In any case, there is hardly any reliable third party coverage. Delete as it fails WP:ORGDEPTH. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 09:32, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Keep - I will make updates to make this page more in line with the other managed dns provider. I think it would be good if companies like Dyn and UltraDNS are listed that also NS1 would be listed. --Cstate2002 (talk) 15:29, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

I have updated the page in line with other similar pages (Dyn, UltraDNS). Cstate2002 (talk) 19:26, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Also, just learned this was needed, I work for NS1 so I have a COI Cstate2002 (talk) 19:42, 14 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - No indication of notability. The existence of other pages has absolutely no bearing on the acceptability of this one. John from Idegon (talk) 19:45, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per WP:GNG and WP:ORG. After fixing a few references on the article (and removing one), I went and found a few sources that discuss the company (here, here, here, and here). However, these sources are either not secondary, only mention the company as part of the subject that the source was primarily covering, or simply provide routine coverage of the article subject per WP:ORGDEPTH (they consist of product announcements or company finance/funding details). I agree that this can be considered WP:TOOSOON, and this company does not yet meet the guidelines required in order to have its own article.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   20:18, 14 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.