Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NSDA District Tournament


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:14, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

NSDA District Tournament

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

While I'm a big proponent of speech and debate, I feel like they're far over-represented on Wikipedia. This article, for instance. It only cites information from the National Speech and Debate Association itself, and looking for more sources none on the topic can be found. I'll grant you that every small-town paper mentions it when someone qualifies, but no substantial coverage exists that rises to general notability. Kharkiv07 ( T ) 01:11, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  12:02, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:06, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. This article is pretty much nothing more than a brochure for the district tournaments.  It gives us nothing of encyclopedic value that isn't already in the article on the national tournament (which itself doesn't provide much more than does the article on the sponsoring organization).  NewYorkActuary (talk) 22:38, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:49, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as still questionable for better solid notability, delete at best and restart later when better information and sources is available. SwisterTwister   talk  04:30, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 28 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.