Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NSGP Championship


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete Only significant contributor consents to deletion Chillum (Need help? Ask me) 15:31, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

NSGP Championship

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

I can find no evidence that this online tournament is covered in reliable sources and therefore believe it fails the notability criteria.

I am also nominating the following related page, because it exists only to elaborate on the NSGP Championship with a list of 2009 participants:

Gonzonoir (talk) 09:22, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:26, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Keep This tournament exists per http://newstarsoccer.com/newstarforum/showthread.php?t=10255 It does not only elaborate a list of the championship racers, it also contains a table along with the winners, 2nd placed players and of the players that got pole positions and where --85.139.161.97 (talk) 12:08, 21 December 2009 (UTC) — 85.139.161.97 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 02:22, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 14:19, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete The issue isn't whether it exists, it's whether there are enough reliable sources to establish notability. --Teancum (talk) 12:34, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete Existing is great and all, but we need enough independent reliable sources to both establish notability and to use as the basis of the article's content. If these can be provided I will reconsider. Chillum (Need help? Ask me) 03:14, 22 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Well, honestly ... there is no notability of the league (i am the one who has been maintaining the article), so it probably should be deleted although i'm not going to argue if you all turn a blind eye! Peter-27 (talk) 12:41, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Perhaps an admin could help Peter27 userfy the data so he can host it elsewhere? Gonzonoir (talk) 15:28, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you for accepting our standards. If you would like a copy of the article just ask me on my talk page and I will e-mail it to you. Chillum (Need help? Ask me) 15:31, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.