Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NTU Renegades


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:29, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

NTU Renegades

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

A British university American football team with little or no claim to notability, as per Articles for deletion/Durham Saints, Articles for deletion/Edinburgh Predators and Articles for deletion/Swansea Titans Pfainuk talk 17:07, 5 April 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: Not notable. University/College sports teams have next to zero following in the UK.  American Football has next to zero following in the UK.  By that measure a University American Football team has less than zero following. Pit-yacker (talk) 17:46, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  —• Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable.-- Bduke   (Discussion)  01:06, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Despite plenty of game-results mentions, I am unable to find anything significant in reliable, independent sources. - DustFormsWords (talk) 02:22, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete no sources, no references, nothing found on google news... I'd like to keep it, but without any sources inside or outside of the article I can't even be sure that it's a real team! And that, my friends, is a reason to delete.  Show me the sources.--Paul McDonald (talk) 03:00, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * You can be pretty sure it's a real team:   .  Just nothing sufficient to pass WP:N, is all. - DustFormsWords (talk) 03:07, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.