Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NUMSA v Bader Bop


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  11:51, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

NUMSA v Bader Bop

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Legal case which seems to fail WP:GNG. Whilst based on a single primary source, it seems like other primary sources exist, but not any secondary coverage by other media outlets. Seems to have only had significance within the context of south African labour law, and was not a decision of any significance to the general populous. If it really should be mentioned on Wikipedia, it should be mentioned only breifly, as it was certainly not the first case to deal with the right to strike, and only one of some local significance. Mako001 (talk) 04:06, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Mako001 (talk) 04:06, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Mako001 (talk) 04:06, 27 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.